Research Article
Artificial Intelligence Based Customer Churn Prediction Model for Business Markets
Table 4
Performance Evaluation of Distinct Runs on Proposed AICCP-TBM Method
| Dataset-1 | Training Size (%) | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | F-Score |
| K = 40 | 95.62 | 97.02 | 97.20 | 97.60 | K = 50 | 97.00 | 96.44 | 97.87 | 98.40 | K = 60 | 96.81 | 98.00 | 97.78 | 98.06 | K = 70 | 96.90 | 97.22 | 97.21 | 96.76 | K = 80 | 97.04 | 97.99 | 96.19 | 97.25 | Average | 96.67 | 97.33 | 97.25 | 97.61 |
| Dataset-2 | Number of Runs | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | F-Score |
| K = 40 | 96.61 | 98.09 | 97.81 | 97.88 | K = 50 | 96.71 | 97.96 | 98.05 | 97.73 | K = 60 | 97.18 | 96.72 | 97.54 | 97.19 | K = 70 | 97.12 | 98.20 | 97.45 | 98.63 | K = 80 | 96.97 | 97.53 | 97.63 | 97.07 | Average | 96.92 | 97.70 | 97.70 | 97.70 |
| Dataset-3 | Number of Runs | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | F-Score |
| K = 40 | 96.28 | 95.31 | 94.47 | 94.42 | K = 50 | 95.81 | 94.40 | 96.57 | 93.21 | K = 60 | 97.01 | 93.95 | 96.36 | 92.40 | K = 70 | 94.94 | 95.31 | 92.34 | 93.21 | K = 80 | 95.38 | 94.86 | 91.92 | 93.20 | Average | 95.88 | 94.77 | 94.33 | 93.29 |
|
|