Opinion Dynamics Model with Bounded Confidence and the Sleeper Effect

<div>The average stabilized opinions of one extremist under different <svg height="6.1673pt" id="M105" style="vertical-align:-0.2063904pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 7.78144 6.1673" width="7.78144pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,2.175,0)"><path d="M393 379C402 394 400 411 393 422C384 437 365 448 348 448C301 448 237 372 186 285H182L193 335C210 408 205 448 178 448C150 448 80 402 29 344L45 321C80 355 114 373 122 373C128 373 130 365 124 330C106 228 76 98 50 -5L57 -12C82 -5 112 3 132 6L172 203C196 256 234 304 254 329C275 355 293 367 306 367C318 367 330 360 342 348C347 343 355 343 365 350S386 367 393 379Z"></path></g></svg> and <svg height="9.14241pt" id="M106" style="vertical-align:-3.1815pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 10.0698 9.14241" width="10.0698pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M387 375C387 402 357 448 257 448C172 448 82 404 82 326C82 289 108 255 156 241V239C85 223 23 181 23 116C23 39 89 -12 182 -12C265 -12 336 31 378 91L361 114C320 73 269 47 216 47C157 47 115 82 115 137C115 191 160 219 218 219C243 219 262 218 272 217L304 259L302 266C295 265 281 264 255 264C195 264 163 294 163 335C163 377 200 416 249 416C293 416 321 389 329 342C331 332 335 329 341 329C355 329 387 352 387 375Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,5.005,3.132)"><path d="M389 0V32C297 38 291 46 291 118V635C234 613 175 595 109 583V556L161 554C203 552 207 547 207 497V118C207 46 201 38 110 32V0H389Z"></path></g></svg> with or without the sleeper effect.</div>

Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

fig4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Opinion Dynamics Model with Bounded Confidence and the Sleeper Effect 