Research Article
[Retracted] Modeling and Optimization of Water Distribution in Mineral Processing considering Water Cost and Recycled Water
Table 11
Five best solutions for Case 2 using EMOABC (qsum = 5000).
| Solutions | q1 (m3/h) | q2 (m3/h) | q3 (m3/h) | q4 (m3/h) | q5 (m3/h) | q6 (m3/h) | C (Q) ($/h) | M (Qʹ) (m3/h) | ƞk |
| S1 | 218 | 324 | 1487 | 1295 | 894 | 692 | 80912 | 27693 | 0.0585 | S2 | 352 | 415 | 1352 | 1415 | 841 | 625 | 80005 | 26490 | 0.0587 | S3 | 364 | 325 | 1238 | 1449 | 828 | 814 | 80087 | 27614 | 0.0596 | S4 | 316 | 348 | 1336 | 1479 | 779 | 742 | 80049 | 26766 | 0.0594 | S5 | 355 | 362 | 1302 | 1209 | 893 | 879 | 79153 | 28276 | 0.0598 |
|
|