Research Article
[Retracted] Modeling and Optimization of Water Distribution in Mineral Processing considering Water Cost and Recycled Water
Table 12
Five best solutions for Case 2 using EMOABC (qsum = 6000).
| Solutions | q1 (m3/h) | q2 (m3/h) | q3 (m3/h) | q4 (m3/h) | q5 (m3/h) | q6 (m3/h) | C (Q) ($/h) | M (Qʹ) (m3/h) | ƞk |
| S1 | 402 | 406 | 1789 | 1703 | 906 | 794 | 102800 | 31215 | 0.0642 | S2 | 421 | 456 | 1859 | 1906 | 806 | 552 | 102540 | 28901 | 0.0649 | S3 | 359 | 396 | 1952 | 1589 | 863 | 841 | 102300 | 31022 | 0.0651 | S4 | 398 | 412 | 1652 | 1856 | 786 | 896 | 102240 | 31272 | 0.0648 | S5 | 416 | 395 | 1742 | 1647 | 911 | 889 | 102230 | 31680 | 0.0654 |
|
|