Research Article
[Retracted] Modeling and Optimization of Water Distribution in Mineral Processing considering Water Cost and Recycled Water
Table 8
Five best solutions for Case 1 using the EMOABC (qsum = 4000).
| Solutions | q1 (m3/h) | q2 (m3/h) | q3 (m3/h) | q4 (m3/h) | C (Q) ($/h) | M (Qʹ) (m3/h) | ƞk |
| S1 | 422 | 2120 | 804 | 654 | 103820 | 22848 | 0.0546 | S2 | 439 | 2206 | 739 | 616 | 103450 | 21892 | 0.0554 | S3 | 432 | 2072 | 824 | 672 | 103380 | 23128 | 0.0562 | S4 | 398 | 2218 | 730 | 654 | 103580 | 22106 | 0.0558 | S5 | 406 | 2195 | 752 | 647 | 103790 | 22289 | 0.0549 |
|
|