Research Article
MFOC-CliqueNet: A CliqueNet-Based Optimal Combination of Multidimensional Features Classification Method for Large-Scale Laser Point Clouds
Table 7
Methods comparison accuracy (%).
| Class | Method | Pole | Vegetation | Wire | Ground | Facade | OA |
| M3N [23] | 28.7 | 97.4 | 12.5 | 98.2 | 90.8 | 91.66 | Literature [24] | 22.3 | 90.7 | 5.3 | 99.6 | 87.6 | 93.53 | Literature [25] | 70.11 | 80.55 | 93.08 | 98.22 | 70.95 | 94.68 | FDM [18] | 68.42 | 80.68 | 92.93 | 98.37 | 71.13 | 94.75 | CRFoptN [26] | 59.7 | 92.0 | 10.7 | 99.9 | 94.6 | 95.5 | MRF [27] | 68.0 | 95.5 | 51.3 | 98.4 | 92.9 | 97.0 | CCM [28] | 82.67 | 97.83 | 30.26 | 99.17 | 90.33 | 97.59 | Our method | 16.0 | 89.8 | 59.1 | 99.5 | 94.6 | 98.9 |
|
|
Bold values highlight the advantages of our method and other literature methods in classification accuracy comparison.
|