[Retracted] Effect Comparison of Assisted Surgery Simulated by Preoperative 3D Reconstruction and Minimally Invasive Surgery with the Assist of Knee Arthroscopy in the Treatment of Tibial Plateau Fracture under the Background of Intelligent Medicine

Table 1

Comparison of clinical data in patients between the two groups.

Projects	Simulation group with 3D reconstruction (n = 50)	Auxiliary group with knee arthroscopy (n = 50)	X^2/t	value
Gender			0.162	0.687
Male/female	27/23	29/21
Average age (Mean ± SD, years)	40.72 ± 13.21	40.74 ± 14.28	0.007	0.994
BMI (Mean ± SD, kg/m^2)	20.31 ± 1.17	20.37 ± 1.16	0.258	0.797
Cause of injury
Traffic accident	24 (48.00)	22 (44.00)	0.161	0.688
Falling injury	13 (26.00)	17 (34.00)	0.762	0.383
Heavy object injury	13 (26.00)	11 (22.00)	0.219	0.640
Time of injury to surgery (mean ± SD, d)	3.14 ± 1.70	3.20 ± 1.68	0.178	0.860
Schatzker typing
Wedge pressure	22 (44.00)	24 (48.00)	0.161	0.688
Cuniform	16 (32.00)	17 (34.00)	0.045	0.832
Comminuted	12 (24.00)	9 (18.00)	0.543	0.461
Fracture sites			0.161	0.688
Left	22 (44.00)	24 (48.00)
Right	28 (56.00)	26 (52.00)
Fracture types
Grade I	17 (34.00)	14 (28.00)	0.421	0.517
Grade II	13 (26.00)	16 (32.00)	0.437	0.509
Grade III	13 (26.00)	14 (28.00)	0.051	0.822
Above grade III	7 (14.00)	6 (12.00)	0.088	0.766
Education level
College or higher	6 (12.00)	9 (18.00)	0.706	0.401
Senior high school	16 (32.00)	18 (36.00)	0.178	0.673
Junior high school and below	28 (56.00)	23 (46.00)	1.000	0.317
Place of residence (n (%))			0.641	0.423
Town	22 (44.00)	26 (52.00)
Countryside	28 (56.00)	24 (48.00)