Research Article
A Novel Approach for Feature Selection and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus: Machine Learning Methods
Table 5
Classification accuracy of different methods with literature.
| Authors | Data size | Techniques | Classification accuracy (%) |
| Li et al. [39] | 768 | Ensemble of SVM, ANN, and NB | 58.3 | Deng and Kasabov [40] | 768 | Self-organizing maps | 78.40 | Brahim-Belhouari and Bermak [16] | 768 | NB, SVM, DT | 76.30 | Smith et al. [41] | 768 | Neural ADAP algorithm | 76 | Choubey et al. [2] | 768 | Ensemble of RF and XB | 78.9 | Quinlan et al. [42] | 768 | C4.5 Decision trees | 71.10 | Bozkurt et al. [43] | 768 | Artificial neural network | 76.0 | Parashar et al. [44] | 768 | SVM, LDA | 77.60 | Sahan et al. [45] | 768 | Artificial immune System | 75.87 | Chatreti et al. [46] | 768 | Linear discriminant analysis | 72 | Christobel and Sivaprakasam [47] | 460 | K-nearest neighbour | 78.16 | Smith et al. [41] | 768 | Ensemble of MLP and NB | 64.1 | Proposed method | 768 | KNN, RF, DT, MLP | 79.8 |
|
|