Investigation of Involvement between Specific Brain Regions and Evaluation Criteria Elements in a Two-Selections Task

Table 2

Common significant brain activation for each label.

Region label	Cluster size	T-statistic	MNI coordinates
			x	y	z
Price vs. dummy
Occipital Mid L	482	9.35	−22	−96	0
Calcarine R	363	8.80	24	−92	2
Color vs. dummy
Fusiform L	484	8.94	−40	−54	−10
Occipital Inf R	59	8.41	36	−84	−12
Lingual R	91	8.01	12	−90	−4
Frontal Sup Medial R	15	7.60	6	24	42
Occipital Mid R	31	7.38	32	−66	26
Insula L	16	7.13	−30	18	−4
Cerebellum 9 R	5	6.90	6	−56	−40
Frontal Inf Tri L	4	6.83	−38	38	10
Calcarine R	7	6.83	6	−62	12
Occipital Sup R	8	6.81	30	−72	46
Frontal Sup 2 L	1	6.78	−12	50	38
Frontal Mid 2 R	1	6.75	36	52	−2
Occipital Mid L	24	6.67	−30	−78	24
Frontal Mid 2 R	1	6.53	30	54	4
Occipital Mid L	1	6.50	−28	−80	18
Angular R	1	6.44	34	−70	46
Year vs. dummy
Occipital Inf L	464	10.26	−38	−82	−10
Occipital Inf R	527	9.80	22	−92	−4
Occipital Mid L	23	7.69	−30	−80	24
Temporal Inf R	19	6.95	50	−64	−12
Cerebellum 6 R	1	6.45	10	−74	−18

Note: region labels were named based on the automated anatomical labeling template [37], which is a digital human brain Atlas with a labeled volume. The labels indicate macroscopic brain structures. Cluster size is reported in voxels. The T-statistic value is the total average, which was calculated for each voxel from MRI data acquired for each subject and divided by the standard deviation of all subjects.