Research Article
[Retracted] Atom Search Optimization with the Deep Transfer Learning-Driven Esophageal Cancer Classification Model
Table 2
Result analysis of the ASODTL-ECC technique with various measures.
| Label | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | F-score | MCC | Jaccard index |
| Entire dataset | Class 0 | 99.33 | 99.60 | 99.20 | 99.01 | 98.51 | 98.03 | Class 1 | 98.27 | 95.20 | 99.80 | 97.34 | 96.11 | 94.82 | Class 2 | 98.40 | 99.20 | 98.00 | 97.64 | 96.46 | 95.38 | Average | 98.67 | 98.00 | 99.00 | 98.00 | 97.02 | 96.08 |
| Training phase (70%) | Class 0 | 99.05 | 99.39 | 98.89 | 98.49 | 97.80 | 97.02 | Class 1 | 97.71 | 94.05 | 99.71 | 96.67 | 95.01 | 93.55 | Class 2 | 97.90 | 98.86 | 97.42 | 96.94 | 95.39 | 94.05 | Average | 98.22 | 97.44 | 98.67 | 97.36 | 96.07 | 94.88 |
| Testing phase (30%) | Class 0 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | Class 1 | 99.56 | 98.46 | 100.00 | 99.22 | 98.92 | 98.46 | Class 2 | 99.56 | 100.00 | 99.34 | 99.33 | 99.00 | 98.67 | Average | 99.70 | 99.49 | 99.78 | 99.52 | 99.31 | 99.04 |
|
|