Research Article
[Retracted] Hybrid Rider Optimization with Deep Learning Driven Biomedical Liver Cancer Detection and Classification
Table 2
Result analysis of HRO-DLBLCC technique with various measures.
| Label | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F-score | MCC |
| Entire dataset | HEM | 99.00 | 97.64 | 99.40 | 98.51 | 97.77 | HCC | 99.33 | 98.61 | 99.40 | 99.00 | 98.50 | MET | 98.60 | 99.18 | 96.60 | 97.87 | 96.85 | Average | 98.98 | 98.48 | 98.47 | 98.46 | 97.71 |
| Training phase (70%) | HEM | 99.05 | 97.81 | 99.44 | 98.62 | 97.90 | HCC | 99.14 | 98.01 | 99.42 | 98.71 | 98.07 | MET | 98.57 | 99.40 | 96.23 | 97.79 | 96.76 | Average | 98.92 | 98.41 | 98.37 | 98.37 | 97.58 |
| Testing phase (30%) | HEM | 98.89 | 97.22 | 99.29 | 98.25 | 97.44 | HCC | 99.78 | 100.00 | 99.35 | 99.67 | 99.51 | MET | 98.67 | 98.69 | 97.42 | 98.05 | 97.04 | Average | 99.11 | 98.64 | 98.69 | 98.66 | 98.00 |
|
|