Research Article
Application of PRP in Chloasma: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
Table 2
Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants.
| Study | Gender (M/F) | Grouping | Fitzpatrick skin type | Depth | Distribution | Baseline score | Duration of illness | Triggering factor |
| Hofny et al. 2019 [3] | 4/19 | A: microneedling with Dermapen | Types III: 7 | Epidermal: 18 | Malar: 1 | MASI:A: 6.13 ± 2.73 | 1–3 years: 12 patients | Sun exposure:16 Hormonal Contraception: 3 | B: microinjections using mesoneedles | Types IV: 16 | Mixed: 5 | Centrofacial: 22 | B: 5.73 ± 2.77 mMASI:5.71 ± 2.56 | ˃3 years: 11 patients | Pregnancy: 4 | Sirithanabadeekul et al. 2020 [4] | 0/10 | A: intradermal PRP | Types III: 2 | Mixed: 10 | — | A: 4.92 ± 0.96 | — | — | B: intradermal normal saline | types V: 8 | B: 4.98 ± 0.86 | Mumtaz et al. 2021 [1] | 35/29 | A: intradermal PRP | — | — | — | A: 29.84 ± 5.14 | A: 24.63 ± 9.87 months | — | B: intradermal tranexamic | B: 29.56 ± 4.39 | B: 23.94 ± 8.93 months | Adel et al. 2021 [18] | 0/20 | A: IPL | Types II: 3 | Epidermal: 6 | Centrofacial: 19 | MASI:16.3 ± 7.7 mMASI: | 2 months-18 years | Sun exposure: 13 | B: PRP-IPL | Types III: 9 | Mixed: 14 | Malar: 1 | A:19 ± 6.4B: 19.8 ± 5.8 | Pregnancy:0 | types V: 8 | | | | | Gamea et al. 2020 [19] | 0/40 | A: topical 5% | Types III (A: 11 B:12) | Epidermal: (A:12 B:8) | — | mMASI: | A:12–72 months | — | Tranexamic acid + PRP | Types IV (A: 9 B:8) | Mixed: (A:8 B:12) | A: 12.1 ± 2.9 | B: 18–80 months | B: topical 5% tranexamic acid | | | B: 11.7 ± 2.98 | | Faiz and Meng 2018 [20] | 12/3 | — | Types III: 4 | — | — | MASI: | — | — | Types IV: 11 | 15.71 ± 6.81 | Tuknayat et al. 2021 [2] | 36/4 | — | Types IV and V | Epidermal: 29 | Malar: 8 | mMASI:13.7 | — | — | Mixed: 11 | Centrofacial: 31 | Mandibular: 1 |
|
|
PRP: platelet-rich plasma; IPL: intense pulse light; MASI: melasma area severity index; mMASI: modified melasma area severity index. |