|
Ref | Focus | Strengths | Type | Software used | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
[49] | Provide a trusted service brokering scheme to deal with multiple user requests for cloud resources | Robust in managing different dynamic service behavior at numerous cloud sites | Prototype | Eucalyptus—cloud environment | | | | Y | Y |
[50] | Provided a trust evolution approach for cloud computing to eliminate the limitation of the existing trust model | It includes factors like user requirements, aggregates qualitative and quantitative evaluation, and incorporates user feedback in the trusted computing | Trust evaluation approach | -- | | | | Y | Y |
[51] | Proposed a trust model for a cloud application to address the security issues | 1. Trust function in the given trust model to secure from a security attack | Model | | Y | | | | |
2. The developed trust model provides integrity, access control, availability, and privacy |
[52] | A fuzzy logic-based trust calculation scheme by which trust is provided by service provided to the participants | To determine the trustworthiness of the cloud supplied using a fuzzy logic-based rating approach to convert the result and compliance values into rating | Scheme | MATLAB | | | Y | | Y |
[53] | A trust evaluation model based on fuzzy logic to predict trust values | Prediction of trust value based on clouds’ user feedback | Evaluation model | MATLAB | | Y | Y | | Y |
[54] | An SLA-based trust model was developed using user behaviour evaluation | Selection of cloud provided based on the SLA parameters | Model | MATLAB | Y | | | Y | |
[55] | A trust model in insecure clouds based on domain partitions to address the issue of overhead and performance of cloud system | Efficient and accurate computation of trust | Model | MATLAB | Y | Y | | | |
[56] | A trust management framework for securing the platforms of cloud computing | Allows the administrator to make decisions and manage the degree of redundancy and cost of resources | Framework | --- | | | Y | Y | |
[57] | A trust architecture allows cloud customers to make decisions about cloud providers based on their reputation | Low overhead | Architecture | N/W simulator | Y | | | | Y |
[58] | A trust management system to evaluate trust and reputation | The system developed is secured and maintains the trust and reputation of the cloud service provider | Evaluation management system | -- | Y | Y | | | |
[59] | A trust evaluation model for improving trust | Robust and secure | Evaluation model | MyEclipse | Y | | | Y | |
Challenges—1. Centralization. 2. Trust evidence. 3. Less adaptive. 4. Huge management overhead. 5. Inaccuracy. |
|