Review Article

The Effectiveness of Interventions in Improving Hand Hygiene Compliance: A Meta-Analysis and Logic Model

Table 2

A logic model based on a socioecological approach delineating inputs, processes, and outcomes to improve hand hygiene compliance.

Situational analysisIntervention targetTarget audienceChange objectivesTheoryMethodsActivitiesShort-term outcomesMedium-term outcomesLong-term outcomes

Influence individualsHealthcare workers (HCWs), patientsHand hygiene compliance(i) Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)
(ii) Freire’s model of adult education
(i) Discussion
(ii) Problem-based learning
(iii) Guided exploration
(i) Identifying the advantages and disadvantages of performing hand hygiene
(ii) Determining people whose approval is important for the person to do hand hygiene
(iii) Identifying barriers to performing hand hygiene
(iv) Identifying facilitators to performing hand hygiene
(v) Brainstorming root causes of poor hand hygiene adherence
(vi) Personalizing the issue and using role-plays to generate emotions
(i) Improved knowledge, perception, and attitudes about hand hygiene compliance(i) Compliance with the WHO “5 moments of hand hygiene” responsibly
(ii) Sustained improvement in hand hygiene
(i) Reduced nosocomial infections
Influence interpersonal levelCoworkers and supervisorsSupportive behavior

Emotional, informational, appraisal, and instrumental support
(i) Social norms theory(i) The train-the-trainer method(i) Participatory discussions between HCWs about hand hygiene compliance
(ii) Creation of new knowledge in a selected group of participants
(iii) Sharing knowledge with others
(i) Improved social norms about hand hygiene in workplace(i) Social approval for hand hygiene compliance
(ii) HCWs imitate each other in performing hand hygiene
(iii) Sustained improvement in hand hygiene
Influence organizational levelDecision-makersSupportive environment: policies and regulationsOrganizational change theory(i) Planning
(ii) Monitoring
(iii) Reviewing
(iv) Rewarding
(i) Designing new and innovative policy for improving hand hygiene
(ii) Providing the essential materials and equipment for hand hygiene compliance
(iii) Continuous monitoring of hand hygiene compliance among staff and patients
(iv) Appropriate reaction to hand hygiene behavior at the right time and place
(v) Performance review with employee self-assessment
(vi) Encouragement of wards that have the highest hand hygiene and the lowest nosocomial infections
(i) Responsive policy for improving hand hygiene(i) Sustained leadership
(ii) Continuous evaluation
(iii) Sufficient facilities
(iv) Sustained improvement in hand hygiene