Research Article
Energy Preserved Sampling for Compressed Sensing MRI
Table 3
Comparison between conventional CF and ICF with 4x acceleration.
| | Sampling | Cost function | MAE | MSE |
| | VD | Conventional CF | 2.70 | 14.92 | | ICF | 2.65 | 14.30 |
| | ePRESS | Conventional CF | 2.05 | 11.14 | | ICF | 1.99 | 10.72 |
|
|
