Research Article
Lung Cancer Classification Employing Proposed Real Coded Genetic Algorithm Based Radial Basis Function Neural Network Classifier
Table 6
Comparison of various lung cancer classification methods.
| Image datasets | Metrics for image classification | Hybrid Logistic Regression-Artificial Neural Network Approach [6] | Hopfield Neural Network & Fuzzy Clustering Approach [7] | Back Propagation Neural Network Approach [8] | SRGWO-ELM Approach
| Proposed RCGA-RBFNN Classifier Approach |
| LIDC cancer datasets | Sensitivity | 68.75 | 70.37 | 92.12 | 98.77 | 99.10 | Specificity | 96.45 | 97.18 | 98.67 | 99.63 | 100.00 | Classification accuracy | 88.12 | 89.07 | 91.11 | 96.72 | 98.36 | AUROC | 0.9050 | 0.9010 | 0.9000 | 0.9800 | 1.00 |
| Real time lung cancer datasets (PSGIMSR) | Sensitivity | 72.39 | 81.37 | 90.65 | 96.57 | 98.42 | Specificity | 85.47 | 89.01 | 95.47 | 98.21 | 99.73 | Classification accuracy | 84.69 | 87.65 | 90.65 | 95.69 | 97.31 | AUROC | 0.7231 | 0.8721 | 0.8700 | 0.9758 | 0.9865 |
|
|