Research Article
Comparison of Three Different Types of Two-Implant-Supported Magnetic Attachments on the Stress Distribution in Edentulous Mandible
| | Material | Structure | Young’s modulus (Mpa) | Poisson’s ratio | Reference |
| | POM | Cushing pad | 5000 | 0.36 | Manufacture | | AUM20 | The keeper (K) | 200,000 | 0.28 | Manufacture | | Ti-6Al-4V | Implant | 110,000 | 0.33 | Colling [17] | | NdFeB (magnet) | The magnet (M) | 160,000 | 0.24 | John et al. [18] | | Pure titanium | The abutment cylinder (A) | 117,000 | 0.30 | Sakaguchi and Borgersen [19] | | Acrylic resin | Artificial teeth and denture base | 8300 | 0.28 | Darbar et al. [20] | | | Cortical bone | 13,700 | 0.3 | Barbier et al. [21] | | | Trabecular bone | 1370 | 0.3 | Barbier et al. [21] | | | Oral mucosa | 680 | 0.45 | Barao et al. [22] |
|
|
|