|
Author | Year | Method | Class | Performance |
|
Conventional machine learning approaches |
Inan et al. [35] | 2006 | Feature extraction: classifier | WT and timing interval Neural network | 3 | ACC: 95.16% |
Sayadi et al. [36] | 2010 | Feature extraction: classifier | Innovation sequence of EKF Bayesian filtering | 2 | ACC: 99.10% |
SEN: 98.77% |
SPEC: 97.47% |
Martis et al. [32] | 2012 | Feature extraction: classifier | PCA SVM with RBF kernel | 5 | ACC: 98.11% |
SEN: 99.90% |
SPEC: 99.10% |
Prasad et al. [37] | 2013 | Feature extraction: classifier | HOS+ICA KNN | 3 | ACC: 97.65% |
SEN: 98.75% |
SPEC: 99.53% |
Martis et al. [38] | 2013 | Feature extraction: classifier | Cumulant+ICA KNN | 3 | ACC: 99.5% |
SEN: 100% |
SPEC: 99.22% |
Martis et al. [7] | 2013 | Feature extraction: classifier | HOS+PCA LS-SVM | 3 | ACC: 93.48% |
SEN: 99.27% |
SPEC: 98.31% |
Martis et al. [39] | 2013 | Feature extraction: classifier | Cumulant+PCA LS-SVM | 5 | ACC: 94.52% |
SEN: 98.61% |
SPEC: 98.41% |
Martis et al. [32] | 2012 | Feature extraction: classifier | DCT+PCA SVM with RBF kernel | 5 | ACC: 99.52% |
SEN: 98.69% |
SPEC: 99.91% |
Martis et al. [40] | 2014 | Feature extraction: classifier | ICA+DCT KNN | 3 | ACC: 99.45% |
SEN: 99.61% |
SPEC: 100% |
Kaya and Pehlivan [41] | 2015 | Feature extraction: classifier | Genetic algorithms KNN | 5 | ACC: 99.69% |
SEN: 99.46% |
SPEC: 99.91% |
Kaya and Pehlivan [8] | 2015 | Feature extraction: classifier | Time series+PCA KNN | 5 | ACC: 99.63% |
SEN: 99.29% |
SPEC: 99.89% |
Li and Zhou [33] | 2016 | Feature extraction: classifier | WPE+RR RF | 5 | ACC: 94.61% |
Mondjar-Guerra et al. [42] | 2018 | Feature extraction: classifier | Wavelets+LBP+HOS+several amplitude values RF | 5 | ACC: 94.5% |
SEN: 66.4% |
SPEC: 70.3% |
Yang and Wei [6] | 2020 | Feature extraction: classifier | Combined parameter and visual pattern features of ECG morphology KNN | 5 | ACC: 97.70% |
This work | 2020 | Feature extraction: classifier | WSN+the 4th time window PNN | 4 | ACC: 99.3% |
SEN: 99.5% |
SPEC: 98.8% |
|
Deep learning approaches |
Martis et al. [40] | 2014 | 9-layer deep convolution neural network | 5 | ACC: 93.47% |
SEN: 96.01% |
SPEC: 91.64% |
|