Review Article

[Retracted] Prognostic Factors of IIIAN2 Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Complete Resection: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis

Table 1

Overview of selected studies.

S. noAuthor’s name, year, and referenceLocationStudy designNo. of patientsDurationStudy centerPrognostic factorsSurvival rate (1 LN)

1Mountain, 1994 [5]Houston, TexasRetrospective data review1,0171983-1988University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer CenterComplete dissection of lymph node
Complete tumor resection
Number and level of lymph nodes involved
Tumor status
5-year survival rate (1LN): 37%
5-year survival rate (2-4 LN): 27%
5-year survival rate (>4 LN): 17%
1,8661977-88National Cancer Institute Cooperative Lung Cancer Study Group
2Vansteenkiste et al., 1997 [13]ChinaRetrospective data review1401985-1993University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Catholic University LeuvenComplete tumor resection
Performance status
Histology analysis
cN2
20.8%
Mediastinoscopy-negative patients: 32.2%
3Tanaka et al., 2004 [14]JapanRetrospective data review99Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto UniversityNumber of LN involved
LN stations
LN status
Proliferative index
5-year survival rate (1LN): 41.6%
5-year survival rate (2-4 LN): 35.3%
5-year survival rate (>4 LN): 0.0%
4Barlési et al., 2005 [9]FranceRetrospective data review951993-2003Hospital Sainte MargueriteLN clearance status
Postoperative issues
Selection of surgical strategy
Complete tumor resection
Blood and pleural invasion
Downstaging
Survival rate: 20 vs. 16 months
5Betticher et al., 2006 [15]SwitzerlandTrial75Clinic of Medical Oncology, Hospital of FribourgComplete tumor resection pathological response downstagingOS: 35 months
EFS: 15 months
6Garrido et al., 2007 [16]SpainTrial62December 1999 to March 2003Hospital Ramon y CajalComplete tumor resection
Clinical response
years
Complete resection
3-year survival rate: 60.1%
5-year survival rate: 41.4%
Incomplete resection
3-year survival rate: 23.1%
5-year survival rate: 11.5%
Nonresected cases
3-year survival rate: 31.1%
5-year survival rate: 0%
7Kim et al., 2007 [17]Republic of KoreaStudy report66Sungkyunkwan University School of MedicineypN0 stage5 years
OS: 27%
DFS: 24%
Local control rates: 90%
8Kim et al., 2008 [18]Republic of KoreaStudy report42January 2001 to January 2006Yonsei University College of MedicineDownstaging2 years
DFS (without LN metastasis): 46%
DFS (with LN metastasis): 18%
9Lee et al., 2008 [19]Republic of KoreaRetrospective data review2621990-2005Yonsei University College of MedicineLN stations
Age
Secondary CT
5-year survival rate (1LN): 33.8%
5-year survival rate (multiple LN): 20.4%
10Albain et al., 2009 [20]USAPhase II trial202Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of MedicineLN stations
Gender
Weight reduction
Median OS: 23.6 months
11Liu et al., 2012 [21]ChinaRetrospective data review632004-2008Peking University First HospitalLN stations
Number and position of involved LNs
2-year recurrence rate: 46.6%
3-year recurrence rate: 57.3%
12Liu et al., 2013 [22]ChinaRetrospective data review892003 to April 2007Peking University First HospitalT3 stage
LN invasion
LN stations
years
Number and position of involved LNs
>3 involved LN refer to worse prognosis
3-year survival rate: 51.7%
5-year survival rate: 31.5%
13Qiang et al., 2014 [23]ChinaRetrospective data review92China-Japan Friendship HospitalNumber and location of involved LNs
Subgrouping of MLN
>3 involved LN refer to worse prognosis
3-year recurrence rate: 61.0%
5-year recurrence rate: 70.2%
14Yoo et al., 2015 [24]Seoul, KoreaRetrospective data review2061997 to 2004University of Ulsan College of MedicineNumber of metastatic LNs5-year OS: 37.7%
15Chen et al., 2020 [10]TaiwanRetrospective data review772006 and 2014China Medical University Hospital<3 cm of tumor LN and VATS approach1-year survival: 91.9%
3-year survival: 61.3%
5-year survival: 33.5%

LVI: lymphatic or vascular invasion; CT: chemotherapy; VATS: video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; DFS: disease-free survival; OS: overall survival; EFS: event-free survival.