Research Article
Emotion Recognition Based on EEG Using Generative Adversarial Nets and Convolutional Neural Network
Table 7
The recognition accuracy (%) of the two models in four classification tasks before and after data augmentation.
| Subject | Case 1 | Case 2 | FBCCNN | FBSCNN | FBCCNN | FBSCNN | S01 | 65.08 | 59.23 | 76.00 | 68.87 | S02 | 66.23 | 60.38 | 77.16 | 70.02 | S04 | 59.64 | 53.79 | 70.57 | 63.43 | S06 | 60.10 | 57.46 | 71.03 | 67.10 | S07 | 60.86 | 55.01 | 71.78 | 64.65 | S08 | 66.43 | 60.58 | 77.36 | 70.22 | S09 | 64.90 | 59.05 | 75.83 | 68.69 | S10 | 65.34 | 59.49 | 76.27 | 69.13 | S11 | 66.22 | 60.37 | 77.15 | 70.00 | S17 | 70.18 | 64.33 | 81.11 | 73.97 | S18 | 58.06 | 52.21 | 68.99 | 61.85 | S22 | 60.32 | 54.47 | 71.25 | 64.11 | Average recognition accuracy results across subjects | Across subjects | 55.87 | 52.34 | 70.34 | 66.90 |
|
|