Research Article
Automated Diagnosis of Chest X-Ray for Early Detection of COVID-19 Disease
Table 5
Comparison of the performance of our proposed system with existing system.
| Previous studies | Number of class | Technique | Overall accuracy (%) | COVID-19 sensitivity (%) |
| Apostolopoulos et al. [38] | 3 classes | MobileNet v2 | 92.80 | 94.00 | VGGNet-19 | 93.50 | 86.00 | Khan et al. [39] | 3 classes | Xception | 90.20 | 89.00 | Ibrahim et al. [40] | 4 classes | ResNet152V2+Bi-GRU | 93.36 | 92.95 | Loey et al. [6] | 3 classes | GoogLeNet | 81.50 | 81.80 | Wang et al. [41] | 3 classes | COVID-Net | 93.30 | 91.00 | VGGNet-19 | 83.00 | 58.70 | ResNet-50 | 90.60 | 83.00 | Muhammad et al. [42] | 3 classes | SqueezeNet | 84.40 | 84.30 | ResNet-50 | 90.00 | 87.40 | Ismael et al. [43] | 2 classes | Fine-tuning of ResNet50 | 92.63 | 88.00 | Proposed model | 4 classes | ResNet-50 | 95.00 | 97.10 | Proposed model | 2 classes | ResNet-50 | 98.00 | 97.40 | Proposed model | 4 classes | AlexNet | 92.00 | 94.50 | Proposed model | 2 classes | AlexNet | 93.00 | 99.30 |
|
|