Research Article

[Retracted] A Meta-Analysis to Detect Efficacy of Physical Activity Interventions to Enhance Effects Related to the Fragility among Older Adults

Table 1

Studies selected with given characteristics.

S. No.StudyCountryYearNumberAge + meanDesign; duration‡ControlDelivery of intervention

1.KuoTaiwan201840 (81/19)O: 67.77 I: 66.93 ± 3.91 C: 71.38 ± 4.22Randomized control trial; 8 weekUsual careResearcher
2.GillUS2002168 (70/30)O: 82 I: 81.8 ± 4.0 C: 82.5 ± 4.2Randomized control trial; 7 monthsMonthly health education sessions for every individualPhysiotherapist
3.Brown et al.US200085 (58/42)I: 81 ± 3 C: 82 ± 1Randomized control trial; 3 monthsHome exercisesNot reported
4.Tsang et al.China2013131 (73/27§)I: 82.33 ± 5.30 C: 83.85 ± 4.03Randomized control trial; 12 weeksNewspaper reading and discussionCertified qigong instructor
5.Chen et al.China202068 (63/37§)I: 75.97 ± 3.19 C: 76.27 ± 6.98Randomized control trial; 9 weeksUsual carePhysiotherapist or community worker
6.Yoon et al.South Korea201878 (78/22§)O: 71.94 ± 5.27 I: 73.82 ± 3.37 C: 76.03 ± 3.27Randomized control trial; 16 weeksUsual care and dynamic stretchingExercise by instructor
7.Takatori et al.,Japan2016256 (90/10)O: 65 ± 3 I: 72.6 ± 4.1 C: 72.9 ± 5.0Clinical controlled trial, 6 monthsLectures on health or improved activityPhysical function, mobility
8.Faber et al.,Netherlands2006277 (79/21§)I: 86.4 ± 4.9, 83.4 ± 5.4 C: 85.9 ± 4.9Randomized control trial; 20 weeksUsual careGroup session by instructor
9.Losa-Reyna et al.Spain201928(74/26§)O: 85.2 ± 4.7 I: 83.0 ± 4.6 C: 82.4 ± 4.8Clinical controlled trial, 6 weeksUsual careNot reported
10.Liu et al., 2017Hong Kong201780(93/7††)O: 78.32 ± 6.72 I: 78.72 ± 6.95, 75.03 ± 8.07‡‡ C: 71.90 ± 5.69Randomized control trial; 16 weeksHealth management talks on healthPhysiotherapist and instructor
11.Kwon et al.Japan201588 (96/4††)O: 77.8 I: 76.0 ± 6.2 C: 75.9 ± 4.9Randomized control trial; 12 weeksUsual health sessionCertified trainer for fitness
12.Giné-Garriga et al.Spain201050(60/40§)I: 82.9 ± 1.8 C: 83.1 ± 2Randomized control trial; 12 weeksUsual health sessionPhysical function
13.de JongNetherlands2000206(69/31)O: 89.7 ± 4.6 I: 74.7 ± 3.4 C: 78.3 ± 5.6Randomized control trial; 17 weeksSocial programResearcher supervised

§ Value based on baseline which is not equivalent to the randomly allocated value but to the number which completed intervention I = intervention; C = control; O = overall.