Research Article
High DHCR7 Expression Predicts Poor Prognosis for Cervical Cancer
Table 2
Logistic regression analysis of correlation of DHCR7 expression with clinicopathological factors.
| Characteristics | Numbers | Odds ratio (OR) | value |
| T stage (T2 and T3 and T4 vs. T1) | 241 | 1.01 (1.00-1.02) | 0.028 | N stage (N1 vs. N0) | 193 | 1.01 (1.00-1.02) | 0.043 | M stage (M1 vs. M0) | 126 | 1.01 (1.00-1.03) | 0.049 | Clinical stage (stage II and stage III and stage IV vs. stage I) | 297 | 1.01 (1.00-1.01) | 0.026 | Primary therapy outcome (CR vs. PD and SD and PR) | 217 | 0.99 (0.98-1.00) | 0.012 | Histological type (squamous cell carcinoma vs. adenosquamous) | 304 | 1.00 (0.99-1.01) | 0.452 | Histologic grade (G3 and G4 vs. G1 and G2) | 272 | 1.00 (1.00-1.01) | 0.521 | Keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma present (yes vs. no) | 304 | 1.00 (1.00-1.01) | 0.630 | PIK3CA status (Mut vs. WT) | 286 | 1.00 (0.99-1.01) | 0.593 |
|
|