Research Article
Auxiliary Pneumonia Classification Algorithm Based on Pruning Compression
Table 1
Comparison of different pruning rates between SR and CP methods on ResNet50.
| | Model | Test acc (%) | Parameters (M) | Pruned (%) | FLOPs (GFlops) | Pruned (%) |
| | ResNet50 (normal) | 97.827 | 23.512 | — | 4.12 | — | | SResNet50 (10% pruned) | 97.707 | 21.58 | 10 | 3.43 | 8.22 | | SResNet50 (30% pruned) | 98.129 | 17.222 | 30 | 2.64 | 26.75 | | SResNet50 (50% pruned) | 97.526 | 12.278 | 50 | 1.85 | 47.78 | | SResNet50 (70% pruned) | 97.888 | 7.466 | 70 | 1.21 | 68.25 | | CPResNet50 (10% pruned) | 97.586 | 20.359 | 10 | 3.43 | 13.41 | | CPResNet50 (30% pruned) | 97.707 | 14.942 | 30 | 2.43 | 36.45 | | CPResNet50 (50% pruned) | 98.189 | 10.337 | 50 | 1.70 | 56.04 | | CPResNet50 (70% pruned) | 97.707 | 6.682 | 70 | 1.15 | 71.58 | | CPResNet50 (80% pruned) | 98.129 | 5.16 | 80 | 0.94 | 78.05 | | CPResNet50 (90% pruned) | 97.888 | 3.888 | 90 | 0.696 | 83.46 |
|
|
