Research Article
Auxiliary Pneumonia Classification Algorithm Based on Pruning Compression
Table 3
Comparison of different pruning rates between CP and CPG methods on ResNet50.
| | Model | Test acc (%) | Parameters (M) | Pruned (%) | FLOPs (G) | Pruned (G) |
| | ResNet50 (normal) | 97.827 | 23.512 | — | 4.12 | — | | GResNet50 | 98.430 | 13.317 | — | 2.32 | 43.36 | | CPResNet50 (10% pruned) | 97.586 | 20.359 | 10 | 3.55 | 13.41 | | CPGResNet50 (10% pruned) | 96.922 | 11.734 | 10 | 2.04 | 50.09 | | CPResNet50 (30% pruned) | 97.707 | 14.942 | 30 | 2.64 | 36.45 | | CPGResNet50 (30% pruned) | 97.224 | 10.336 | 30 | 1. 85 | 61.66 | | CPResNet50 (50% pruned) | 98.189 | 10.337 | 50 | 1.85 | 56.04 | | CPGResNet50 (50% pruned) | 97.043 | 9.015 | 50 | 1. 58 | 56.04 | | CPResNet50 (70% pruned) | 97.707 | 6.682 | 70 | 1.21 | 71.58 | | CPGResNet50 (70% pruned) | 96.922 | 4.863 | 70 | 1.18 | 79.32 | | CPResNet50 (80% pruned) | 98.129 | 5.16 | 80 | 0.94 | 78.05 | | CPGResNet50 (80% pruned) | 97.103 | 4.096 | 80 | 0.715 | 82.58 | | CPResNet50 (90% pruned) | 97.888 | 3.888 | 90 | 0.696 | 83.46 | | CPGResNet50 (90% pruned) | 97.745 | 3.455 | 90 | 0.591 | 85.31 |
|
|
