Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine / 2022 / Article / Tab 2 / Research Article
[Retracted] Application of CT Postprocessing Reconstruction Technique in Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Nodules and Analysis of Risk Factors Table 2 Comparison of CT signs of benign and malignant SPN patients.
Factors Benign SPN group ( ) Malignant SPN group ( ) Nodule location Left lung 28 (43.75%) 31 (36.05%) 0.913 0.339 Right lung 36 (56.25%) 55 (63.95%) Nodule location Upper lobe 30 (46.88%) 49 (56.98%) 1.502 0.220 Middle and lower lobes 34 (53.12%) 37 (43.02%) Nodule density Solid 54 (84.38%) 74 (86.05%) 0.082 0.775 Subsolid 10 (15.63%) 12 (13.95%) Nodule diameter (mm) 33.887 <0.001 Lobulation sign Yes 7 (10.94%) 28 (32.56%) 9.588 0.002 None 57 (89.06%) 58 (67.44%) Burr sign Yes 18 (28.13%) 46 (53.49%) 9.650 0.002 None 46 (71.87%) 40 (46.51%) Calcification component Yes 20 (31.25%) 2 (2.33%) 24.528 <0.001 None 44 (68.75%) 84 (97.67%) Ground-glass component Yes 4 (6.25%) 72 (83.72%) 88.105 <0.001 None 60 (93.75%) 14 (16.28%) Vacuolar sign Yes 0 (0.00%) 7 (8.14%) 3.144 0.076 None 64 (100.00%) 79 (91.86%) Vessel convergence Yes 3 (4.69%) 10 (11.63%) 2.233 0.135 None 61 (95.31%) 76 (88.37%) Pleural depression sign Yes 19 (29.69%) 38 (44.19%) 3.274 0.070 None 45 (70.31%) 48 (55.81%)