Research Article

Social Risk Assessment and Management for Major Construction Projects in China Based on Fuzzy Integrated Analysis

Table 5

Weight of CSRFs and CSRGs.

Categories/groupsSocial risk factorsPOMI
ValueFactor weightGroup valueGroup weightValueFactor weightGroup valueGroup weight

Policy/legal (c1)Unfair compensation for housing demolition and land requisition (d11)5.060.2223.380.295.440.2224.570.3
Forced demolition (d12)4.750.215.250.22
Violation of laws and rules (d13)4.630.24.940.2
Unreasonable relocation (d14)4.690.24.750.19
Variations in policies or compensation standards (d15)4.250.184.190.17

Society (c2)Poor credibility of government (d21)5.130.2222.820.284.940.2222.320.27
Disturbance of local residents (d22)4.810.214.690.21
Negative attitudes of local residents towards project (d23)4.560.24.50.2
Media dissemination (d24)4.130.184.130.19
Unemployment problem (d25)4.190.184.060.18

Environment (c3)Environment pollution (water, land, noise, etc.) (d31)5.0615.060.064.4414.440.06

Finance (c4)Lack of funds (d41)4.9414.940.064.1314.130.05

Project/technique (c5)Engineering quality problems (d51)4.8114.810.065150.06

Organization/management (c6)Government’s improper administration (d61)4.690.2121.950.264.810.2222.060.27
Security hidden danger (d62)4.50.214.750.22
Lack of information on key stakeholders’ interests (d63)4.630.214.060.18
Decision-maker moral (d64)4.190.194.130.19
Decision-maker competence (d65)3.940184.310.19

Sum82.9682.52