Social Risk Assessment and Management for Major Construction Projects in China Based on Fuzzy Integrated Analysis

Table 9

Rank comparison.

Social risk factors	Weighted average			Date in Table 2
	PO	MI	IRL	Rank	Rank	Normalized values
Unfair compensation for housing demolition and land requisition (d11)	0.325	0.388	0.355	1	1	1
Forced demolition (d12)	0.301	0.368	0.333	2	3	0.89
Poor credibility of government (d21)	0.31	0.301	0.305	3	2	0.90
Engineering quality problems (d51)	0.292	0.304	0.298	4	4	0.85
Disturbance of local residents (d22)	0.298	0.284	0.291	5	6	0.78
Environment pollution (water, land, noise, etc.) (d31)	0.313	0.269	0.290	6	8	0.775
Violation of laws and rules (d13)	0.277	0.301	0.289	7	5	0.79
Unreasonable relocation (d14)	0.253	0.295	0.273	8	9	0.77
Government’s improper administration (d61)	0.24	0.297	0.267	9	7	0.78
Lack of funds (d41)	0.301	0.218	0.256	10	12	0.67
Negative attitudes of local residents towards project (d23)	0.277	0.231	0.253	11	11	0.68
Security hidden danger (d62)	0.201	0.289	0.241	12	10	0.72
Lack of information on key stakeholders’ interests (d63)	0.237	0.215	0.226	13	13	0.60
Decision-maker moral (d64)	0.218	0.218	0.218	14	15	0.52
Decision-maker competence (d65)	0.203	0.225	0.214	15	18	0.50
Unemployment problem (d25)	0.213	0.207	0.210	16	17	0.50
Variations in policies or compensation standards (d15)	0.204	0.215	0.209	17	14	0.54
Media dissemination (d24)	0.15	0.218	0.181	18	16	0.50