Research Article
Complex Effects of Drum Hub Forms and Structural Parameters on Coal Loading Performance
Table 4
The difference between conveying flow rate and cutting rate of drums with different rotational speeds.
| n (rpm) | Qt (m3/min) | 1.371 | Drum | I | II | III | IV | V | VI | VII | VIII |
| 40 | Qz (m3/min) | 1.911 | 1.675 | 1.402 | 1.085 | 0.715 | 1.319 | 1.368 | 1.652 | Qz − Qt (m3/min) | 0.540 | 0.304 | 0.031 | −0.286 | −0.656 | −0.052 | −0.003 | 0.281 | 60 | Qz (m3/min) | 2.867 | 2.513 | 2.103 | 1.628 | 1.073 | 1.979 | 2.052 | 2.478 | Qz − Qt (m3/min) | 1.496 | 1.142 | 0.732 | 0.257 | −0.298 | 0.608 | 0.681 | 1.107 | 80 | Qz (m3/min) | 3.822 | 3.350 | 2.804 | 2.170 | 1.430 | 2.638 | 2.736 | 3.304 | Qz − Qt (m3/min) | 2.451 | 1.979 | 1.433 | 0.799 | 0.059 | 1.267 | 1.365 | 1.933 | 100 | Qz (m3/min) | 4.778 | 4.188 | 3.505 | 2.713 | 1.788 | 3.298 | 3.420 | 4.130 | Qz − Qt (m3/min) | 3.407 | 2.747 | 2.134 | 1.342 | 0.417 | 1.919 | 2.049 | 2.759 |
|
|