The Impact of International Research Collaboration Network Evolution on Chinese Business School Research Quality
Table 10
Number and proportion of different type of institutions in top 10, 30, and 50 based on centrality analysis.
Stages
2000–2008
2009–2013
2014–2018
Indicator
Degree centrality
Rank
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(3)
Top10
6 (60%)
4 (40%)
0
9 (90%)
1 (10%)
0
9 (90%)
1 (10%)
0
Top30
11 (37%)
18 (60%)
1 (3%)
14 (47%)
14 (47%)
2 (6%)
13 (43%)
15 (50%)
2 (7%)
Top50
11 (22%)
37 (74%)
2 (4%)
16 (32%)
30 (62%)
4 (8%)
19 (38%)
27 (54%)
4 (8%)
Indicator
Betweenness centrality
Rank
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(3)
Top10
6 (60%)
4 (40%)
0
8 (80%)
2 (20%)
0
10
0
0
Top30
10 (33%)
19 (63%)
1 (3%)
18 (60%)
11 (37%)
1 (3%)
18 (60%)
10 (33%)
2 (7%)
Top50
13 (26%)
35 (70%)
2 (4%)
20 (40%)
26 (52%)
4 (8%)
23 (46%)
23 (46%)
4 (8%)
Indicator
Closeness centrality
Rank
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(1)
(2)
(3)
Top10
5 (50%)
5 (50%)
0
7 (70%)
3 (30%)
0
8 (80%)
2 (20%)
0
Top30
8 (27%)
21 (70%)
1 (3%)
14 (47%)
15 (50%)
1 (3%)
14 (47%)
14 (47%)
2 (6%)
Top50
11 (22%)
37 (74%)
2 (4%)
16 (32%)
31 (62%)
3 (6%)
18 (36%)
28 (56%)
4 (8%)
Note. (1), the number and proportion of domestic universities; (2), the number and proportion of foreign universities; (3), the number and proportion of other institutions (enterprise or research institute).
