|
Category | Advantage | Disadvantage | Method sample | Sample advantage | Sample disadvantage |
|
NWP models | Suitable for long-term forecast | Hard to deal with short-term horizons and costs a lot of computing time and resources | Computational fluid dynamics (FLUENT, CFD) | High parallel efficiency | High requirement of dataset length, limited simulation range |
Mesoscale numerical model (MM5, WRF) | Accurate simulation and a large number of alternative parameterization schemes | Suitable for weather forecast, not specifically optimized for wind prediction |
Physical schema (predictor) | Can predict spatial properties | Expensive calculation cost |
|
Statistical strategies | Wide application, less running time | Assumption difficult to achieve | Time series (ARIMA, ARCH, GARCH, GM (1, 1)) | Simple model assumptions, good self-fitness | Poor extrapolation, limited prediction range |
Cluster | Strong fault tolerance, simple human-computer interaction | Low accuracy, lack of systematicness |
|
Machine learning | Excellent robustness, little model risk, wide application | High complexity, high requirements of knowledge | Neural network (FNN, BPNN, GRNN, ELMAN) | Excellent fitting effect nonlinear property | The model is unstable, high degree of data dependence |
Artificial intelligence (PSO, GA, BA, DA) | Easy to be understood and combined with other methods | Easy to fall into local extremum |
Data denoising (EMD, EEMD, CEEMD, SSA) | Eliminate the negative impact of noise data | The mode mixing problem in EMD and the residual noise in EEMD |
Deep learning (CNN, RNN, LSTM) | Strong fault tolerance, simple human-computer interaction | Low accuracy when the amount of data is small, lack of systematicness |
|