Research Article

Real Estate Asset Management Companies’ Economies of Scale: Is It a Dream or Reality? The Italian Case

Table 7

Coefficients resulting from the first regression.

Y = asset under management
YearRegressorEstimateStd. errort valuePr ()Adjusted R2

2013No. of employees0.876830.094299.2999.42e − 100.7599

2014No. of employees0.59210.10905.4321.22e − 050.8257
No. of r.e. funds0.40500.10903.7160.00102

2015No. of employees0.62220.11575.3801.4e − 050.803
No. of r.e. funds0.35930.11573.1060.00467

2016No. of employees0.601020.099166.0612.47e − 060.8059
No. of r.e. funds0.434150.099164.3780.000187

2017No. of employees0.52710.11024.7828.02e − 050.773
No. of r.e. funds0.49890.11024.5260.000152

2018No. of employees0.61100.10975.5701.34e − 050.8046
No. of r.e. funds0.40640.10973.7050.00123

Signif. codes: 0.001; 0.01; 0.05. All variables exhibit positive coefficients.