Circle-Based Ratio Loss for Person Reidentification

Table 3

The comparisons of our proposed method with LMCL and ArcFace on Market-1501, DukeMTMC-reID, and CUHK03 datasets.

Methods	m	Market-1501		DukeMTMC-reID		CUHK03 labeled		CUHK03 detected
		mAP	Rank-1	mAP	Rank-1	mAP	Rank-1	mAP	Rank-1
LMCL [21]	0.01	82.49	92.70	71.87	84.29	63.12	63.71	61.42	63.36
	0.1	82.93	93.11	72.32	84.92	63.55	66.50	62.54	63.64
	0.3	82.05	92.49	71.43	83.93	63.32	64.64	60.71	62.00
	0.5	81.70	93.02	70.68	84.07	62.15	64.21	58.49	60.43
	1.0	81.15	92.25	70.51	84.11	61.86	63.50	58.46	59.79
ArcFace [5]	0.01	82.31	92.99	71.19	84.02	63.02	64.21	60.92	63.00
	0.1	82.70	92.96	71.28	83.93	64.33	66.50	62.54	64.93
	0.3	82.52	92.99	71.09	84.78	65.20	67.57	62.65	63.43
	0.5	81.28	92.34	70.54	83.89	64.62	65.86	61.83	63.07
	1.0	80.86	91.42	69.60	83.08	62.76	64.14	60.72	61.50
Ours	—	83.12	92.64	71.66	84.34	66.26	68.57	63.24	65.07

The bold values indicate the best results of all the methods on each metric. They are beneficial to compare between our proposed method and the other methods.