Review Article

Trusted Service Evaluation for Mobile Edge Users: Challenges and Reviews

Table 2

Research protocol of objective user rating.

CategoryTitleAuthorsPublication yearPublisher

Privacy protection of QoS recordPrivacy Preserving Model: A New Scheme for Auditing Cloud Stakeholders [37]Razaque et al.2017Journal of Cloud Computing
Amplified LSH-Based Recommender Systems with Privacy Protection [25]Chi et al.2020Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience
Security-Aware Dynamic Scheduling for Real-Time Optimization in Cloud-Based Industrial Applications [38]Meng et al.2021IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
An Optimization and Auction Based Incentive Mechanism to Maximize Social Welfare for Mobile Crowdsourcing [39]Wang et al.2019IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
A Novel Hybrid Method to Analyze Security Vulnerabilities in Android Applications [40]Tang et al.2020Tsinghua Science and Technology

The relevance of QoS naturesBusiness Correlation-Aware Modeling and Services Selection in Business Service Ecosystem [27]Luo et al.2013International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing
Multi-Dimensional Quality-Driven Service Recommendation with Privacy-Preservation in Mobile Edge Environment [28]Zhong et al.2020Computer Communications

The service evaluation based on QoS recordDeep Sequential Model for Anchor Recommendation on Live Streaming Platforms [41]Zhang et al.2021Big Data Mining and Analytics
Multi-Dimensional Quality-Driven Service Recommendation with Privacy-Preservation in Mobile Edge Environment [28]Zhong et al.2020Computer Communications
Rater Credibility Assessment in Web Services Interactions [21]Malik et al.2009World Wide Web Journal

The weight distribution of QoS recordHow Textual Quality of Online Reviews Affect Classification Performance: A Case of Deep Learning Sentiment Analysis [42]Li et al.2020Neural Computing and Applications