Review Article
Improving Land Use Planning through the Evaluation of Ecosystem Services: One Case Study of Quyang County
Table 1
Current landscape structure of the study area.
| Landscape type | Area (hm2) | Ratio (%) |
| Agricultural land landscape | Cultivated land landscape | Water irrigated landscape | 691.9296 | 45.44 | Dryland landscape | 228.8777 | 15.03 | Forestland landscape | | 209.8259 | 13.78 | Landscape | | 44.3930 | 2.92 | Other agricultural land landscape | Farmland road landscape | 38.0402 | 2.50 | | Trench landscape | 30.0666 | 1.97 | | Landscape of farmland shelter | 0.1882 | 0.01 |
| Construction land landscape | Rural settlements landscape | | 223.7001 | 14.69 | Special land landscape | Funeral land landscape | 1.0948 | 0.07 |
| Other land landscape | Nature reserve landscape | Sandy land landscape | 35.7669 | 2.35 | Naked landscape | 11.8958 | 0.78 | Tian Kan landscape | 0.0875 | 0.01 | Grassland landscape | 6.9157 | 0.45 |
| Total | 1,522.7820 | 100.00 |
|
|