Review Article
Improving Land Use Planning through the Evaluation of Ecosystem Services: One Case Study of Quyang County
Table 5
Ecosystem service value per unit area of the ecosystem in the study area (yuan/hm2·a).
| Function | Farmland | Garden plot | Forestland | Rural construction land | Water surface | Unused land |
| Gas regulation | 451.25 | 1940.50 | 3158.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | Climate change | 803.25 | 1624.61 | 2436.88 | 0.00 | 415.14 | 0.00 | Water conservation | 541.52 | 1805.09 | 2888.13 | 27.03 | 18393.86 | 27.03 | Soil formation and conservation | 1317.74 | 2639.96 | 3519.92 | 18.05 | 8.98 | 18.05 | Waste disposal | 1480.22 | 1182.38 | 1182.38 | 8.98 | 16408.33 | 8.98 | Biodiversity conservation | 640.76 | 1963.04 | 2942.29 | 306.82 | 2247.37 | 306.82 | Food production | 902.60 | 180.54 | 90.27 | 8.98 | 90.27 | 8.98 | Raw materials | 90.27 | 1195.85 | 2346.61 | 0.00 | 8.98 | 0.00 | Entertainment culture | 8.98 | 595.68 | 1155.25 | 8.98 | 3917.00 | 8.98 | Total | 6236.59 | 13127.66 | 19720.68 | 378.83 | 41489.93 | 378.83 |
|
|