Review Article

Improving Land Use Planning through the Evaluation of Ecosystem Services: One Case Study of Quyang County

Table 6

Landscape structure comparison before and after planning.

Land classesPrior period (hm2)Percentage (%)Regulation (hm2)Percentage (%)Increase or decrease (hm2)Percentage (%)

Agricultural landCultivated landWater irrigated land691.929645.44973.258363.91281.328718.47
Drylands228.877715.030.00000.00−228.8777−15.03
Subtotal920.807360.47973.258363.9152.45103.44
Garden44.39302.9240.60312.67−3.7899−0.25
Forestland209.825913.78213.423814.023.59790.24
Other agricultural landFarmland roads38.04022.5041.39222.723.35200.22
Channels30.06661.9728.19291.85−1.8737−0.12
Farmland shelter0.18820.014.04150.273.85330.25
Subtotal68.29504.4873.62664.845.33160.35
Total1243.321281.651300.911785.4357.59053.78

Construction landRural settlements223.700114.69217.124914.26−6.5752−0.43
Subtotal223.700114.69217.124914.26−6.5752−0.43
Special land useFuneral and burial sites1.09480.070.34080.02−0.7540−0.05
Subtotal1.09480.070.34080.02−0.7540−0.05
Total224.794914.76217.465714.28−7.3292−0.48

Other landNatural reservesSandy land35.76692.353.30290.22−32.4640−2.13
Bare land11.89580.780.78200.05−11.1138−0.73
Tian Kan0.08750.010.08750.010.00000.00
Grassland6.91570.450.23220.02−6.6835−0.44
Subtotal54.66593.594.40460.29−50.2613−3.30
Total54.66593.594.40460.29−50.2613−3.30

Total land area1522.7820100.001522.7820100.000.00000.00