Review Article
Improving Land Use Planning through the Evaluation of Ecosystem Services: One Case Study of Quyang County
Table 6
Landscape structure comparison before and after planning.
| Land classes | Prior period (hm2) | Percentage (%) | Regulation (hm2) | Percentage (%) | Increase or decrease (hm2) | Percentage (%) |
| Agricultural land | Cultivated land | Water irrigated land | 691.9296 | 45.44 | 973.2583 | 63.91 | 281.3287 | 18.47 | Drylands | 228.8777 | 15.03 | 0.0000 | 0.00 | −228.8777 | −15.03 | Subtotal | 920.8073 | 60.47 | 973.2583 | 63.91 | 52.4510 | 3.44 | | Garden | | 44.3930 | 2.92 | 40.6031 | 2.67 | −3.7899 | −0.25 | Forestland | | 209.8259 | 13.78 | 213.4238 | 14.02 | 3.5979 | 0.24 | Other agricultural land | Farmland roads | 38.0402 | 2.50 | 41.3922 | 2.72 | 3.3520 | 0.22 | Channels | 30.0666 | 1.97 | 28.1929 | 1.85 | −1.8737 | −0.12 | Farmland shelter | 0.1882 | 0.01 | 4.0415 | 0.27 | 3.8533 | 0.25 | Subtotal | | 68.2950 | 4.48 | 73.6266 | 4.84 | 5.3316 | 0.35 | Total | | | 1243.3212 | 81.65 | 1300.9117 | 85.43 | 57.5905 | 3.78 |
| Construction land | Rural settlements | | 223.7001 | 14.69 | 217.1249 | 14.26 | −6.5752 | −0.43 | Subtotal | | 223.7001 | 14.69 | 217.1249 | 14.26 | −6.5752 | −0.43 | Special land use | Funeral and burial sites | 1.0948 | 0.07 | 0.3408 | 0.02 | −0.7540 | −0.05 | Subtotal | | 1.0948 | 0.07 | 0.3408 | 0.02 | −0.7540 | −0.05 | Total | | | 224.7949 | 14.76 | 217.4657 | 14.28 | −7.3292 | −0.48 |
| Other land | Natural reserves | Sandy land | 35.7669 | 2.35 | 3.3029 | 0.22 | −32.4640 | −2.13 | Bare land | 11.8958 | 0.78 | 0.7820 | 0.05 | −11.1138 | −0.73 | Tian Kan | 0.0875 | 0.01 | 0.0875 | 0.01 | 0.0000 | 0.00 | Grassland | 6.9157 | 0.45 | 0.2322 | 0.02 | −6.6835 | −0.44 | Subtotal | | 54.6659 | 3.59 | 4.4046 | 0.29 | −50.2613 | −3.30 | Total | | | 54.6659 | 3.59 | 4.4046 | 0.29 | −50.2613 | −3.30 |
| Total land area | | | 1522.7820 | 100.00 | 1522.7820 | 100.00 | 0.0000 | 0.00 |
|
|