Research Article
Green Credit, Financial Ecological Environment, and Investment Efficiency
Table 4
The impact of green credit on investment efficiency.
| | | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | M6 | M7 |
| | Pollution | 0.0165 | 0.0196 | 0.0196 | 0.0199 | 0.0190 | 0.0191 | 0.0194 | | (0.0020) | (0.0022) | (0.0021) | (0.0021) | (0.0021) | (0.0022) | (0.0020) | | After | 0.0085 | −0.0067 | −0.0068 | −0.0069 | −0.0079 | −0.0082 | −0.0079 | | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | | Pollution × After | 0.0029 | −0.0030 | −0.0030 | −0.0030 | −0.0029 | −0.0028 | −0.0026 | | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | (0.0010) | | Size | | −0.0020 | −0.0021 | −0.0021 | −0.0020 | −0.0020 | −0.0015 | | | (0.0002) | (0.0002) | (0.0002) | (0.0002) | (0.0002) | (0.0002) | | Roa | | | 0.0147 | 0.0109 | 0.0158 | 0.0158 | 0.0069 | | | | (0.0037) | (0.0038) | (0.0038) | (0.0038) | (0.0039) | | Growth | | | | 0.0020 | 0.0023 | 0.0023 | 0.0021 | | | | | (0.0005) | (0.0005) | (0.0005) | (0.0005) | | Tat | | | | | −0.0037 | −0.0036 | −0.0032 | | | | | | (0.0005) | (0.0005) | (0.0005) | | Ids | | | | | | 0.0063 | 0.0046 | | | | | | | (0.0034) | (0.0034) | | Age | | | | | | | −0.0033 | | | | | | | | (0.0003) | | cons | 0.0164 | 0.0591 | 0.0599 | 0.0603 | 0.0598 | 0.0580 | 0.0546 | | (0.0018) | (0.0038) | (0.0038) | (0.0038) | (0.0038) | (0.0040) | (0.0039) |
| | R2 adjusted | 0.0588 | 0.0669 | 0.0678 | 0.0690 | 0.0722 | 0.0726 | 0.0795 | | F | 26.7022 | 29.9979 | 29.7287 | 29.8250 | 30.0947 | 29.6057 | 31.0591 | | N | 18349 | 18349 | 18349 | 18349 | 18349 | 18287 | 18287 |
|
|
Notes: standard deviations are in parentheses; , , and indicate significant differences at , , and , respectively. |