The Impact of Risk Preference in Decision Behavior on Urban Expansion Morphology

Table 4

Comparison between results of urban development in unreasonable planning scenario and no-planning scenario.

Attitude	Situation		A	P	Plan (%)	NP	AI	AWCI	A + P
Cautious	No planning		32.25	26.67		8	0.9551	96.89	58.92
	Unreasonable planning	20%	29.18	27.18	83.9	4	0.9689	98.10	56.36
		50%	28.69	27.17	86.1	6	0.9714	98.30	55.86
		80%	28.45	27.16	87.1	8	0.9721	98.39	55.61
	Difference	20%	−3.07	0.51		−4	0.0138	1.21	−2.56
		50%	−3.56	0.50		−2	0.0163	1.41	−3.06
		80%	−3.80	0.49		0	0.017	1.50	−3.31
Neutral	No planning		32.88	26.34		12	0.9494	96.36	59.22
	Unreasonable planning	20%	29.89	27.27	80.1	13	0.9636	97.62	57.16
		50%	29.41	27.27	82.6	9	0.966	97.85	56.68
		80%	29.08	27.27	84.2	6	0.9684	98.07	56.35
	Difference	20%	−2.99	0.93		1	0.0142	1.26	−2.06
		50%	−3.47	0.93		−3	0.0166	1.49	−2.54
		80%	−3.80	0.93		−6	0.019	1.71	−2.87
Reckless	No planning		33.59	25.78		18	0.9415	95.65	59.37
	Unreasonable planning	20%	30.65	27.04	76.8	22	0.9543	96.8	57.69
		50%	30.14	27.12	79.4	20	0.9583	97.18	57.26
		80%	29.84	27.16	80.9	21	0.9604	97.35	57.00
	Difference	20%	−2.94	1.26		4	0.0128	1.15	−1.68
		50%	−3.45	1.34		2	0.0168	1.53	−2.11
		80%	−3.75	1.38		3	0.0189	1.70	−2.37