The Impact of Risk Preference in Decision Behavior on Urban Expansion Morphology

Table 5

Comparison between results of urban development in the situations of reasonable planning and unreasonable planning.

Attitude	Situation		A	P	Plan (%)	NP	AI	AWCI	A + P
Cautious	Unreasonable planning	20%	29.18	27.18	83.9	4	0.9689	98.10	56.36
		50%	28.69	27.17	86.1	6	0.9714	98.30	55.86
		80%	28.45	27.16	87.1	8	0.9721	98.39	55.61
	Reasonable planning	20%	30.04	27.56	87.4	12	0.9714	98.33	57.60
		50%	29.87	27.6	88.1	11	0.9732	98.50	57.47
		80%	29.75	27.62	88.6	10	0.9739	98.56	57.37
	Difference	20%	0.86	0.38	3.5	8	0.0025	0.23	1.24
		50%	1.18	0.43	2.0	5	0.0018	0.20	1.61
		80%	1.30	0.46	1.5	2	0.0018	0.17	1.76
Neutral	Unreasonable planning	20%	29.89	27.27	80.1	13	0.9636	97.62	57.16
		50%	29.41	27.27	82.6	9	0.966	97.85	56.68
		80%	29.08	27.27	84.2	6	0.9684	98.07	56.35
	Reasonable planning	20%	30.19	27.50	87.1	18	0.9675	97.96	57.69
		50%	29.94	27.56	88.2	17	0.9702	98.22	57.50
		80%	29.81	27.59	88.7	15	0.9716	98.35	57.40
	Difference	20%	0.30	0.23	7.0	5	0.0039	0.34	0.53
		50%	0.53	0.29	5.5	8	0.0042	0.37	0.82
		80%	0.73	0.32	4.5	9	0.0032	0.28	1.05
Reckless	Unreasonable planning	20%	30.65	27.04	76.8	22	0.9543	96.80	57.69
		50%	30.14	27.12	79.4	20	0.9583	97.18	57.26
		80%	29.84	27.16	80.9	21	0.9604	97.35	57.00
	Reasonable planning	20%	30.73	27.25	85.4	14	0.9601	97.33	57.98
		50%	30.32	27.38	87.1	18	0.9631	97.59	57.70
		80%	30.11	27.43	88.0	18	0.9655	97.82	57.54
	Difference	20%	0.08	0.21	8.6	−8	0.0058	0.53	0.29
		50%	0.18	0.26	7.7	−2	0.0048	0.41	0.44
		80%	0.27	0.27	7.1	−3	0.0051	0.47	0.54