Research Article
Manufacturer’s Collaborative Business Strategy with Two Different Reverse Channels in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain
Table 3
Results of the payment strategy per unit returned cartridge (s = 0.65, k = 0.6).
| Manufacturer’s investment | Manufacturer’s profit | Manufacturer’s sales revenue | Total investment | The effect of manufacturing cost reduction | Retailer | Recycler |
| Share of revenue from manufacturing cost reduction + Share of revenue from new cartridge sales = (74%) | 0.139/return cartridge | 11.4 | 29.1 | 2.1 | 3.8 | 0.167/unit returned cartridge | 12.4 | 30.3 | 3.8 | 6.4 | 0.222/unit cartridge | 12.9 | 32.2 | 5.6 | 8.5 | 0.278/return cartridge | 12.4 | 33.4 | 7.1 | 9.9 | Detailed analysis of optimal investment in the payment strategy per unit returned cartridge |
| Total investment of manufacturer | Manufacturer’s profit | Proportion of customers who return cartridges | Manufacturer’s investment/returned cartridge unit | Recycler | Retailer | Recycler | Retailer | Recycler | Retailer | 2.01 (26%) | 5.81 (74%) | 12.9 | 57.4% | 42.6% | 0.22 | 0.356 |
|
|