Network Position and Crowdsourcing Innovation Contribution Behavior: The Moderating Role of Knowledge Absorption Capacity

Table 1

The summary table of hypotheses.

No.	The description of hypotheses
H1a	The user’s degree centrality has a positive impact on his/her proactive contribution behavior
H1b	The user’s degree centrality has a positive impact on his/her responsive contribution behavior
H1c	The user’s eigenvector centrality has a positive impact on his/her proactive contribution behavior
H1d	The user’s eigenvector centrality has a positive impact on his/her responsive contribution behavior
H1e	The user’s structural hole has a positive impact on his/her proactive contribution behavior
H1f	The user’s structural hole has a positive impact on his/her responsive contribution behavior
H2a	The user’s knowledge acquisition capacity has a positive impact on his/her proactive contribution
H2b	The user’s knowledge acquisition capacity has a positive influence on his/her responsive contribution
H2c	The user’s knowledge application capacity has a positive impact on his/her proactive contribution
H3a	The user’s degree centrality has a positive impact on his/her knowledge acquisition capacity
H3b	The user’s eigenvector centrality has a positive impact on his/her knowledge acquisition capacity
H3c	The user’s structural hole has a positive impact on his/her knowledge acquisition capacity
H3d	The user’s degree centrality has a positive impact on his/her knowledge application capacity
H3e	The user’s structural hole has a positive impact on his/her knowledge application capacity
H4a	The user’s knowledge acquisition capacity plays a mediator role between the degree centrality and proactive contribution behavior
H4b	The user’s knowledge acquisition capacity plays a mediator role between the eigenvector centrality and proactive contribution behavior
H4c	The user’s knowledge acquisition capacity plays a mediator role between the structural hole and proactive contribution behavior
H4d	The user’s knowledge acquisition capacity plays a mediator role between the degree centrality and responsive contribution behavior
H4e	The user’s knowledge acquisition capacity plays a mediator role between the eigenvector centrality and responsive contribution behavior
H4f	The user’s knowledge acquisition capacity plays a mediator role between the structural hole and responsive contribution behavior
H4g	The user’s knowledge application capacity plays a mediator role between the degree centrality and proactive contribution behavior
H4h	The user’s knowledge application capacity plays a mediator role between the eigenvector centrality and proactive contribution behavior
H4i	The user’s knowledge application capacity plays a mediator role between the structural hole and proactive contribution behavior