Optimal Calculation Method of Mean Equivalent Diameter of Floc Particles Based on MCC

<div>Toy problem with ninety inliers ranging from 4.6 mm to 7.7 mm and ten outliers ranging from 0.8 mm to 2 mm. The conventional samples’ mean <span class="nowrap"><svg height="11.927pt" id="M154" style="vertical-align:-3.291101pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 14.1906 11.927" width="14.1906pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M488 658H270V630C328 626 335 619 335 579C217 574 44 509 44 330C44 147 221 88 335 86C335 38 328 32 265 28V0H488V28C425 32 418 38 418 86C534 88 710 153 710 337C710 517 538 575 418 579C418 619 425 626 488 630V658ZM335 118C249 124 136 180 136 337C136 490 251 543 335 547V118ZM418 547C502 543 618 491 618 333S503 124 418 118V547Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,9.802,3.132)"><path d="M387 400C387 425 348 451 303 451C247 451 176 414 132 376C69 322 24 228 24 148C24 43 74 -12 147 -12C211 -12 301 33 363 103L346 128C319 99 249 51 193 51C148 51 112 84 112 165C112 230 130 287 154 330C170 359 199 400 243 400C277 400 304 383 326 354C333 345 343 343 354 348C378 360 387 382 387 400Z"></path></g></svg>,</span> the valid samples’ mean <span class="nowrap"><svg height="11.9453pt" id="M155" style="vertical-align:-3.309401pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 14.556 11.9453" width="14.556pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M488 658H270V630C328 626 335 619 335 579C217 574 44 509 44 330C44 147 221 88 335 86C335 38 328 32 265 28V0H488V28C425 32 418 38 418 86C534 88 710 153 710 337C710 517 538 575 418 579C418 619 425 626 488 630V658ZM335 118C249 124 136 180 136 337C136 490 251 543 335 547V118ZM418 547C502 543 618 491 618 333S503 124 418 118V547Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,9.802,3.132)"><path d="M219 86C216 168 211 250 206 337C201 410 189 448 163 448C131 448 79 396 43 344L60 322C91 359 110 375 118 375S132 358 136 298C141 238 152 81 155 -12H182C242 62 331 177 390 258C435 321 451 360 451 391C450 424 432 448 408 448C390 448 372 435 366 419C362 410 362 401 366 394C373 383 376 367 376 350C376 283 262 138 221 86H219Z"></path></g></svg>,</span> and MCC-based samples’ mean <span class="nowrap"><svg height="11.927pt" id="M156" style="vertical-align:-3.291101pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 31.7281 11.927" width="31.7281pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M488 658H270V630C328 626 335 619 335 579C217 574 44 509 44 330C44 147 221 88 335 86C335 38 328 32 265 28V0H488V28C425 32 418 38 418 86C534 88 710 153 710 337C710 517 538 575 418 579C418 619 425 626 488 630V658ZM335 118C249 124 136 180 136 337C136 490 251 543 335 547V118ZM418 547C502 543 618 491 618 333S503 124 418 118V547Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,9.802,3.132)"><path d="M1006 650H829L492 147L357 650H174L166 618C270 609 275 601 247 502L194 315C158 189 136 127 122 96C104 56 80 37 18 32L12 0H256L263 32C181 40 176 51 183 98C188 132 197 179 226 281L299 541H301L433 6H458L809 551H811L753 141C739 41 734 39 650 32L642 0H917L923 32C836 39 827 41 839 142L887 535C896 610 901 612 997 618L1006 650Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,18.694,3.132)"><path d="M690 629C653 643 577 667 483 667C225 667 24 528 24 292C24 92 174 -17 367 -17C448 -17 534 1 570 10C592 34 642 131 658 174C648 180 639 186 629 192C562 89 499 21 382 21C223 21 130 138 130 298C130 467 255 627 462 627C582 627 643 589 650 462L686 466C689 517 688 580 690 629Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,24.854,3.132)"><path d="M690 629C653 643 577 667 483 667C225 667 24 528 24 292C24 92 174 -17 367 -17C448 -17 534 1 570 10C592 34 642 131 658 174C648 180 639 186 629 192C562 89 499 21 382 21C223 21 130 138 130 298C130 467 255 627 462 627C582 627 643 589 650 462L686 466C689 517 688 580 690 629Z"></path></g></svg>.</span></div>

Complexity

fig5

Figure 5

Figure 5: Optimal Calculation Method of Mean Equivalent Diameter of Floc Particles Based on MCC 