Analysis of the Coupling Coordination and Spatiotemporal Evolution of High-Tech Industrial Technological Innovation and Regional Economic Development

Table 5

Average value and ranking of three-stage technological innovation efficiency and total efficiency of Chinese provincial (municipal) high-tech industry from 2009 to 2018.

Province (city)	Technology R&D efficiency	Ranking	Technology transformation efficiency	Ranking	Industrial efficiency	Ranking	Overall efficiency	Ranking
Beijing	0.3618^#	24	0.3046	17	0.9016	1	0.4632	7
Tianjin	0.4015^#	20	0.3827	13	0.8659	2	0.5105	2
Hebei	0.4895	5	0.2253^#	24	0.1622	20	0.2615	22
Shanxi	0.4343	13	0.2784^#	19	0.2460	18	0.3099	19
Liaoning	0.4127^#	17	0.3355	15	0.2905	16	0.3426	14
Jilin	0.4403	12	0.3853	12	0.0945^#	24	0.2521	23
Heilongjiang	0.4234	15	0.2917	18	0.0983^#	23	0.2299	24
Shanghai	0.4113	18	0.2447^#	23	0.6581	3	0.4046	12
Jiangsu	0.4640	8	0.4434	9	0.5359	7	0.4795	5
Zhejiang	0.4700	7	0.5076	5	0.4735	9	0.4834	4
Anhui	0.5182	2	0.5722	2	0.3511	12	0.4704	6
Fujian	0.4452	10	0.4060	10	0.6495	4	0.4897	3
Jiangxi	0.5111	3	0.4748	7	0.1449^#	22	0.3276	16
Shandong	0.4576	9	0.3895	11	0.4763	8	0.4395	9
Henan	0.4901	4	0.5126	4	0.3684	10	0.4523	8
Hubei	0.4272	14	0.2460^#	22	0.3291	13	0.3258	17
Hunan	0.4169^#	16	0.5903	1	0.3052	14	0.4219	11
Guangdong	0.3952^#	22	0.2600	20	0.6247	5	0.4004	13
Guangxi	0.4424	11	0.5027	6	0.1528^#	21	0.3239	18
Chongqing	0.5336	1	0.5329	3	0.5636	6	0.5432	1
Sichuan	0.4787	6	0.4692	8	0.3622	11	0.4333	10
Guizhou	0.4095^#	19	0.3261	16	0.2907	15	0.3386	15
Yunnan	0.3963^#	21	0.3424	14	0.2187	19	0.3096	20
Shaanxi	0.3776^#	23	0.2529	21	0.2597	17	0.2916	21
Mean value	0.4420		0.3865		0.3926