Research Article

Analysis of the Coupling Coordination and Spatiotemporal Evolution of High-Tech Industrial Technological Innovation and Regional Economic Development

Table 5

Average value and ranking of three-stage technological innovation efficiency and total efficiency of Chinese provincial (municipal) high-tech industry from 2009 to 2018.

Province (city)Technology R&D efficiencyRankingTechnology transformation efficiencyRankingIndustrial efficiencyRankingOverall efficiencyRanking

Beijing0.3618#240.3046170.901610.46327
Tianjin0.4015#200.3827130.865920.51052
Hebei0.489550.2253#240.1622200.261522
Shanxi0.4343130.2784#190.2460180.309919
Liaoning0.4127#170.3355150.2905160.342614
Jilin0.4403120.3853120.0945#240.252123
Heilongjiang0.4234150.2917180.0983#230.229924
Shanghai0.4113180.2447#230.658130.404612
Jiangsu0.464080.443490.535970.47955
Zhejiang0.470070.507650.473590.48344
Anhui0.518220.572220.3511120.47046
Fujian0.4452100.4060100.649540.48973
Jiangxi0.511130.474870.1449#220.327616
Shandong0.457690.3895110.476380.43959
Henan0.490140.512640.3684100.45238
Hubei0.4272140.2460#220.3291130.325817
Hunan0.4169#160.590310.3052140.421911
Guangdong0.3952#220.2600200.624750.400413
Guangxi0.4424110.502760.1528#210.323918
Chongqing0.533610.532930.563660.54321
Sichuan0.478760.469280.3622110.433310
Guizhou0.4095#190.3261160.2907150.338615
Yunnan0.3963#210.3424140.2187190.309620
Shaanxi0.3776#230.2529210.2597170.291621
Mean value0.44200.38650.3926