Information Dissemination and Control of NIMBY Projects under Stigmatization

Table 1

Indicators of public risk perception.

Target layer	Criterion layer	Index layer	Description	Main reference
Public perceived risk	Spatial relationship	Construction site A1	Geographical distance between the project construction site and the center of residential area	Cong et al. [8]; Gallo [51]; Sun et al. [52]
		Population density A2	The ratio of population per unit area to national average population density
	Humanistic risk	Education degree A3	The ratio of proportion of local education funds in financial expenditure to its national level	Devine-Wright [53]; Liu et al. [54]; Xu and Lin [55]
		Income level A4	Ratio of local per capita disposable income to national per capita disposable income
	Environmental risk	Project investment A5	Total investment	Johnson [2]; Dai et al. [56]; Cong et al. [57]; He et al. [40]; Botetzagias et al. [58]
		Annual output A6	The number of products or services per year after the completion of the project
		Health hazards A7	According to NFPA 704 identification standard, the health hazards caused by NIMBY project are divided into 0–4 levels; level 4 is the degree of health hazards
		Security threats A8	According to National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 704 identification standard, the flammability and reactivity of the project materials or products are divided into 0–4 grades
		Environmental pollution A9	The pollutants are determined according to the specific project type, and the environmental pollution of the project is divided into four levels according to the relevant national standards
		Ecological damage A10	Based on Daily’s research [57], the degree of ecological damage can be divided into four levels. Grades 1–4 represent 3–10 years, 10–20 years, 20–50 years, and more than 50 years of ecological restoration time