Most Effective Sampling Scheme for Prediction of Stationary Stochastic Processes

<div>Comparison between <svg height="12.3002pt" id="M115" style="vertical-align:-0.04980087pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -12.2504 18.9808 12.3002" width="18.9808pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,1.07,-3.223)"><path d="M658 557C549 593 437 629 340 673H318C222 629 109 593 0 557L9 532C116 551 225 577 329 602C435 576 543 551 649 532L658 557Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M669 636L663 650H260C230 650 221 652 208 675H186C177 621 162 548 144 481L173 479C195 534 211 560 226 578C248 604 266 615 373 615H544C460 511 114 112 23 16L31 0H561C577 34 611 135 622 170L594 182C566 125 544 88 515 65C481 38 416 35 319 35C249 35 197 37 152 41C270 184 542 501 669 636Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,8.996,-5.741)"><path d="M418 650H141L133 618C225 611 232 604 218 531L141 120C126 45 119 37 33 32L24 0H301L308 32C220 37 214 44 227 120L305 531C319 605 325 611 411 618L418 650Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,12.528,-5.741)"><path d="M636 22C611 29 589 38 560 74C536 104 518 134 495 173L430 300C518 328 592 392 592 492C592 555 563 594 528 618C491 643 435 650 377 650H140L131 618C222 610 223 601 208 518L137 136C121 43 116 40 27 32L18 0H295L300 32C212 40 206 42 223 138L248 279H296C334 279 350 272 369 230C393 174 413 140 441 94C482 24 523 1 626 -8L636 22ZM497 480C497 422 468 374 417 343C387 324 353 315 304 315H255L298 556C303 583 309 598 319 603C331 610 348 613 367 613C448 613 497 573 497 480Z"></path></g></svg> and <svg height="12.3002pt" id="M116" style="vertical-align:-0.04980087pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -12.2504 18.9808 12.3002" width="18.9808pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,1.07,-3.223)"><path d="M658 557C549 593 437 629 340 673H318C222 629 109 593 0 557L9 532C116 551 225 577 329 602C435 576 543 551 649 532L658 557Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M669 636L663 650H260C230 650 221 652 208 675H186C177 621 162 548 144 481L173 479C195 534 211 560 226 578C248 604 266 615 373 615H544C460 511 114 112 23 16L31 0H561C577 34 611 135 622 170L594 182C566 125 544 88 515 65C481 38 416 35 319 35C249 35 197 37 152 41C270 184 542 501 669 636Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,8.996,-5.741)"><path d="M418 650H141L133 618C225 611 232 604 218 531L141 120C126 45 119 37 33 32L24 0H301L308 32C220 37 214 44 227 120L305 531C319 605 325 611 411 618L418 650Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,12.528,-5.741)"><path d="M636 22C611 29 589 38 560 74C536 104 518 134 495 173L430 300C518 328 592 392 592 492C592 555 563 594 528 618C491 643 435 650 377 650H140L131 618C222 610 223 601 208 518L137 136C121 43 116 40 27 32L18 0H295L300 32C212 40 206 42 223 138L248 279H296C334 279 350 272 369 230C393 174 413 140 441 94C482 24 523 1 626 -8L636 22ZM497 480C497 422 468 374 417 343C387 324 353 315 304 315H255L298 556C303 583 309 598 319 603C331 610 348 613 367 613C448 613 497 573 497 480Z"></path></g></svg> with normal errors for some fixed <svg height="9.49473pt" id="M117" style="vertical-align:-0.2063999pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.28833 6.21949 9.49473" width="6.21949pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M452 333C452 398 425 448 375 448C329 448 235 404 140 292H138L229 683C233 701 234 712 225 712C208 712 149 686 66 677L64 652H97C135 652 140 651 129 598L38 167C23 96 29 57 44 33C60 7 98 -12 132 -12C169 -12 232 3 290 41C383 102 452 223 452 333ZM365 316C365 199 308 87 239 49C221 39 200 35 183 35C137 35 99 70 112 163C116 191 123 215 129 233C190 316 290 392 330 392C348 392 365 372 365 316Z"></path></g></svg> and all <span class="nowrap"><svg height="6.1673pt" id="M118" style="vertical-align:-0.2063904pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -5.96091 6.7023 6.1673" width="6.7023pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M483 97L471 123C436 91 401 65 392 65C388 65 384 74 390 106C414 239 444 378 457 429L455 433C444 433 429 436 416 439C392 444 368 448 344 448C281 448 204 415 152 376C71 315 23 205 23 103C23 21 57 -12 85 -12C114 -12 149 6 185 34C231 70 285 119 329 183H331L309 81C292 0 308 -12 326 -12C350 -12 421 24 483 97ZM374 387C370 363 356 291 345 261C315 193 181 50 139 50C124 50 110 71 110 118C110 224 153 331 218 379C238 394 271 402 301 402C329 402 359 394 374 387Z"></path></g></svg>.</span></div>

Complexity

fig5

Figure 5

Figure 5: Most Effective Sampling Scheme for Prediction of Stationary Stochastic Processes 