Research Article

The Hesitation of Anxious Traders in an Agent-Based Model

Table 2

Simulations with evolutionary proportions. Note: This table presents deviations from the fundamental information, market proportions of anxious agents, the benefit of the anxious agent’s strategy, the difference in benefits between the anxious and fundamentalist agents, and the momentum strengths. The indicator of behavioral hesitation (denoted by d) ranges from 1 to 5. When d equals 1, the expectation for price of the anxious agent can be written as . Hence, the anxious agent does not embody hesitation since the agent only relies on the single-period forecast error in such a case. However, hesitation begins to emerge if d is 2 or over 2 since the agent refers to multiperiod forecast errors. For the sake of inferring statistical significance, we perform a one-sample t-test in every simulation window. Furnished with such exercises, the averages of the t-statistics across windows are obtained. Gatti and Grazzini [88] and García-Magariño et al. [89] also employ the same inference procedure.

dMeant (mean)

Panel A: deviations from fundamentals
1−0.805−2.866
2−0.870−3.058
3−0.911−3.191
4−0.913−3.194
5−0.915−3.210

Panel B: proportions of anxious agents
10.5444.189
20.5413.915
30.5403.744
40.5413.866
50.5413.818

Panel C: anxious agents’ benefit
10.003054.364
20.000150.202
3−0.00004−0.045
4−0.00021−0.259
5−0.00032−0.384

Panel D: anxious agents’ benefit minus fundamentalist agents’ benefit
10.0926.174
20.0865.638
30.0815.311
40.0855.526
50.0835.443

Panel E: momentum strength
1−0.314−5.273
2−0.221−3.703
3−0.195−2.772
4−0.230−3.260
5−0.141−1.934