Multiobjectives for Optimal Geographic Routing in IoT Health Care System

Table 2

Review on conventional routing protocol in WSN.

Ref. no.	Proposed model	Pros	Cons
1	EMGR	(i) High PDR; (ii) Minimal overhead; (iii) Less complexity	(i) Wastage of resources should be concerned more
2	EGRPM	(i) Maximizes life span; (ii) Minimizes delay	(i) No consideration of overhead
3	ECMSE	(i) Higher energy utilization; (ii) Improved throughput; (iii) Higher PDR	(i) Network interference issues are not deliberated
4	SelGOR	(i) High reliability; (ii) Lower computational cost	(i) Delay performance is not good
5	HiLSeR	(i) High throughput; (ii) Enhances PDR	(i) Low PDR; (ii) High end-to-end delay.
6	“Neuro-Fuzzy Rule-Based Cluster Formation and Routing Protocol”	(i) Higher energy utilization; (ii) Improved network life span; (iii) Higher PDR	(i) High computational complexity; (ii) Higher delay; (iii) Higher end-to-end delay
7	SFG	(i) Reducing data overflow; (ii) Lower bandwidth usage	(i) Less convergence rate
8	FGSA	(i) Increased residual energy; (ii) Maximum network energy	(i) Lower count of alive nodes