Travel Matrix Decomposition for Understanding Spatial Long-Distance Travel Structure

Table 1

Rank of destination amenity.

Ranks	Destination amenities		Population size-corrected destination amenity (difference from the regression line of Figure 7)
1	Tokyo	+0.00	Okinawa	+0.91
2	Hokkaido	−0.65	Hokkaido	+0.71
3	Osaka	−0.75	Tokyo	+0.62
4	Aichi	−1.09	Nagano	+0.59
5	Fukuoka	−1.25	Yamanashi	+0.40
43	Shimane	−2.98	Ibaraki	−0.40
44	Kochi	−3.07	Kanagawa	−0.46
45	Tokushima	−3.13	Chiba	−0.52
46	Tottori	−3.19	Saitama	−0.72
47	Nara	−3.28	Nara	−0.81