Research Article
An Efficient Sentiment Classification Method with the Help of Neighbors and a Hybrid of RNN Models
Table 5
Performance comparison of different models.
| Model | Metric | Dataset | BG | BIS | MVSA-Single | Twitter | IMDB |
| CNN | CNN | Accuracy | 98.30 | 97.02 | 80.86 | 94.83 | Precision | 98.23 | 98.21 | 81.09 | 94.82 | Recall | 98.35 | 96.24 | 80.86 | 94.83 | F1-score | 98.30 | 97.22 | 80.92 | 94.82 |
| GRU | GRU | Accuracy | 98.34 | 97.06 | 80.90 | 94.89 | Precision | 98.30 | 98.24 | 81.03 | 94.89 | Recall | 98.37 | 96.27 | 80.80 | 94.90 | F1-score | 98.32 | 97.24 | 80.86 | 94.88 |
| LSTM | LSTM | Accuracy | 98.40 | 97.12 | 80.96 | 94.93 | Precision | 98.33 | 98.31 | 81.19 | 94.92 | Recall | 98.45 | 96.34 | 80.96 | 94.93 | F1-score | 98.40 | 97.32 | 81.02 | 94.92 |
| LSTM-CNN | LSTM-CNN | Accuracy | 98.85 | 97.57 | 81.41 | 95.38 | Precision | 98.78 | 98.76 | 81.64 | 95.37 | Recall | 98.90 | 96.79 | 81.41 | 95.38 | F1-score | 98.85 | 97.77 | 81.47 | 95.37 |
| Bi-LSTM | Bi-LSTM | Accuracy | 99.10 | 97.82 | 81.66 | 95.63 | Precision | 99.03 | 99.01 | 81.89 | 95.62 | Recall | 99.15 | 97.04 | 81.66 | 95.63 | F1-score | 99.10 | 98.02 | 81.72 | 95.62 |
| Bi-GRU | Bi-GRU | Accuracy | 99.20 | 97.92 | 81.76 | 95.73 | Precision | 99.13 | 99.11 | 81.99 | 95.72 | Recall | 99.25 | 97.14 | 81.76 | 95.73 | F1-score | 99.20 | 98.12 | 81.82 | 95.72 |
| DTSC | DTSC | Accuracy | 99.60 | 98.32 | 82.19 | 96.13 | Precision | 99.55 | 99.51 | 82.39 | 96.12 | Recall | 99.65 | 97.54 | 82.16 | 96.13 | F1-score | 99.60 | 98.52 | 82.22 | 96.12 |
|
|